My main takeaway from Superman was that it was overstuffed with ideas... though the virtue of that was that for every undercooked element that didn't work for me, somewhere in the movie was another element that really soared. I found The Fantastic Four to be a much more leveled-out experienced with neither any great peaks or valleys. The same things that might have excited me were inextricably linked to things that gave me pause. So while the movie was by no means "bad," I left not feeling particularly high about any it.
Here is the first Marvel movie in memory that truly required no "prior reading" from the ponderous MCU. Fresh characters, fresh story, fresh setting... and all of that felt great. Yet rather than embrace an opportunity to tell a story with more modest stakes, this franchise-within-a-franchise starts off immediately with an intergalactic villain whose evil scheme is literally to destroy the entire Earth. It's an apocalypse so vast that it almost instantly becomes abstract.
The cast is full of highlights... but then the movie doesn't really make room for anyone to shine. Pedro Pascal is a performer with so much charm and magnetism that he leaps off the screen even in a show where you almost never see his face. So something seems really wrong to me that in this movie, he seems "fine." Vanessa Kirby made the early episode of The Crown a true highlight of the season. She's "fine" too. Joseph Quinn stole season four of Stranger Things, making his character the most memed-about thing in that show since "Justice for Barbara." I'll leave it for people who have watched The Bear to opine on Ebon Moss-Bachrach's contributions to that show, but I'll wager they are noteworthy. Here? "Fine" and "fine."
Maybe even more emblematic of this issue is the inclusion of Natasha Lyonne in the movie. I get it, she's very much a secondary character. But I've enjoyed her charming... uh, Lyonne-iness... in everything from Poker Face to Russian Doll to even a voice on Big Mouth. I feel like something has gone very wrong somewhere with the script, the directing, the editing -- maybe all three -- that she's flat and forgettable in this movie. But basically, everywhere you turn in this movie, you see a performer who should be great, coming off as "good enough, I guess."
Even the setting left me of two minds. The retro-future world of this movie is really delightful, something fun and different that looks... well, fantastic... and deftly skirts the issue of making classic superheroes work in a modern world. It certainly helped this movie stand apart from the raft of other superhero movies. And yet... I often found myself thinking, "they're doing The Incredibles." Yes, from the vantage of superpowers and family dynamics, I'm well aware of who was ripping off who. But in feeding the snake its own tail here, this movie really leans into a few elements of The Incredibles plot that kind of make it impossible to ignore. They even get the same composer, Michael Giacchino, to do the score. (He does his best not to copy himself, but you're not going to get two completely different takes on similar material from one composer.)
Still, when I add everything up, I feel I land on giving The Fantastic Four: First Steps a B-. Any less, down in C territory, and I feel like I'd be saying it was a bad movie. But there really are no bad performances, it looks great, and no serious missteps like some of the muddled entries in the MCU. It's probably a movie I should have let myself just catch up with late on streaming at some point, without getting caught up in the "fantastic" hype.