Almost every
Oscar season has at least one film that, while excluded from the Best
Picture race, is lauded for multiple performances. Most recently, The
Danish Girl was one of those films. It tells the true story* of Lili
Elbe, the first person** to undergo sex reassignment*** surgery.
Those
various asterisks illuminate some of the reasons this film may have
been excluded from Best Picture contention. First, * -- this story is
fictionalized, based on a novel by David Ebershoff that took
considerable liberties with the actual facts. Second, ** -- though much
of the talk around this film anointed Lili Elbe as the "first" to
undergo surgery, that also isn't factually accurate. Third, *** -- such
surgeries are often called "gender confirmation" procedures in our more
enlightened age, though some aspects of Lili's character in the film
belie this more affirmative terminology.
If
you head into the movie with eyes open, knowing it's not quite reality,
and accepting that it may not be authentic to the experience of most
modern transgender people, then the film is commendable on many levels.
Seeing past those shortcomings might admittedly be a big ask; certainly,
those issues could spark a worthy discussion of whether a largely
positive on-screen representation (even if flawed) is to be praised and
encouraged. It's a discussion I don't think I could do justice to here.
So
instead, I will say that the movie does spin a moving tale, regardless
of how much is fact and how much is fiction. The journey that Einar
Wegener takes to become Lili Elbe is emotional, filled with highs and
lows. And I also the Oscars were very right to single out the actors as
key to making the movie work.
Eddie
Redmayne plays Einar/Lili, and gives a strong performance. Praising
Redmayne's work does lead to still more fair discussion points -- the
appropriateness of casting a cisgender actor to play a transgender
character, and whether the century-old period setting of this story
affects that question in any way. Regardless of whether you see no
problem here, or think Redmayne's casting is as offensive as Mickey
Rooney in Breakfast at Tiffany's, the fact remains that Redmayne's work
here is excellent: soulful and sympathetic.
But
Oscar also got it right in giving a nomination only to Redmayne, and
giving an actual win, for Best Supporting Actress, to Alicia Vikander.
That's because Vikander, as Einar's wife Gerda, gives an even stronger
performance across the board. (And the only controversy there is that
she was in the "Supporting" category for what is clearly a Lead role.)
Gerda is an even stronger character, even more sympathetic. Vikander
lands every moment of the emotional wringer her character goes through,
trying to understand how to help the person she loves. As good as
Redmayne may be in this movie, one could imagine other performers doing
as well with the material. But I'm hard-pressed to think of anyone else
that could do what Vikander does here.
No comments:
Post a Comment