I had
never previously seen any film in the Kung Fu Panda series, but a while
back I started at the beginning to see if I'd missed out on anything
great.
Though
the original movie is less than a decade old (released in 2008), it
already feels a touch dated for a variety of reasons. First, computer
animation has progressed in leaps and bounds over the last nine years.
Kung Fu Panda doesn't look "bad" by any stretch, but it's lacking in
some of the subtle details, the extra polish, the enhanced capabilities
of what several studios routinely deliver today. If this movie's story
was up to the standards of, say, classic Pixar, this criticism might not
even rate a mention. But this could be a preview of how an audience
might receive some of the more recent, "average" Pixar movies a decade
down the line: movies like Brave or Monsters University.
Second,
and more noticeable in my mind, is that Kung Fu Panda is an artifact of
the "star driven" era of animated features. Look back on the beginning
of "Disney renaissance" of the 90s; they starred relative unknowns. Then
came the age where major stars headlined animated features just as they
would live action movies. Things seem to be pulling away from that a
bit now; movies like Wreck-It Ralph, Frozen, and The Good Dinosaur certainly cast established actors with esteemed careers, but the
movies don't hinge on you coming to see that A-lister you love rendered
in pixel form.
Not
Kung Fu Panda. It feels like it was either written top to bottom for
this exact cast of actors, or that the script was extensively altered to
fit the cast they put together. Jack Black IS Jack Black in this
movie.... but he's hardly the only one hired to provide a voice exactly as it normally sounds. Dustin Hoffman, Ian McShane, Lucy Liu, Jackie
Chan, Seth Rogen, and David Cross are all playing perfectly in type,
with Angelina Jolie as the only cast member you might not have
recognized simply by closing your eyes.
This
doesn't make Kung Fu Panda a bad movie, but it does add to the ways in
which it's awfully recognizable. It's a standard "chosen one needs to
learn how to be the chosen one" story that could only be new to the
children who are its target audience (and maybe not even for some of
them). All the beats prescribed by Joseph Campbell and the "Save the
Cat" school of screenwriting are here. It's quite rote.
But
it is also funny, and more than occasionally. Po (the titular panda)
has an earnest quality that fosters a lot of goodwill, and sets up for
some good "fanboy" humor. There are fat jokes, but not so many to wear
them out. I found myself smiling at the good naturedness of it all more
than rolling my eyes at the familiarity.
I'd
say the movie rates a B- overall. It doesn't send me rushing to see the
sequels (which I hear aren't as good anyway), but it was fun enough on
its own.
No comments:
Post a Comment