The 2008 World Series of Poker had recently gotten started when I was in Las Vegas for my vacation not long ago. And I thought that by right about now, it would be culminating in the conclusion of the Main Event.
Not so.
This year, the decision was made to play the Main Event down to the final table of nine players, and then send them all away with no outcome. This gives ESPN time to lazily spool out their coverage as they have done for the last several years, stretching the Main Event out to provide around two months of weekly content for their network. And only then, when they've finally caught up and aired everything leading up to the final table... only then will they reconvene those nine players to actually conclude the event.
That won't be happening until November.
I think this sucks royally on a few levels. Some of the reasons are mentioned in that article I linked to.
First, the down time of four months will give players time to thoroughly research the play styles of any famous competitors at the final table. This definitely goes against the "just your wits and endurance" ethic I feel the WSoP Main Event has always had.
Secondly, there was something to be said about the marathon of endurance to play the whole event in one stretch. That much concentration, that much sleep deprivation, that much focus, all in one run.... that's also part of what the event is about. Now granted, this wasn't always the case, since the size of the Main Event has increased by literally dozens of times since the poker boom of this decade. Nevertheless, I think that's part of what the event has become today, and you know this change isn't happening to "return to the ways of old." It was done because ESPN asked for it.
But there's one other thing that bugs me about this the most. This wasn't even mentioned in the article, I suppose because only nine people in the world will be affected by it: can you imagine being one of the people who actually made that final table? There you are, right on the cusp, just a few more hours to go, and you might win $9,000,000!
In four months.
Can you imagine what a hell your life would be for those four months? Would you be able to think about anything else, ever? How could you get through a day without drowning in the anxiety of thinking that there might somehow be something you could be doing to improve your chances for the battle of your life coming up in November? How could you not begin to doubt the skills that got you that far in the first place, and find yourself getting rattled and in fact sabotaging your chances to win?
Man, that would suck. I mean, don't get me wrong, if it could be me waiting four months for a chance to sit at the final table of the WSoP Main Event, don't think I wouldn't want that.
I'm just sayin'...
7 comments:
Man, this sucks. Yeah, waiting all that time to figure out whether you walk away a winner of not would be excruciating.
And it does take away the whole stamina aspect of the tournament.
But hey, ESPN gets more dollars out of it!
Isn't it strange how life turns out? When TV first started to broadcast poker events, everyone was impressed at the appeal of poker -- enough appeal for TV to get interested.
Now it's the other way around: TV is DICTATING the way poker events are held. Shit.
FKL
What's the 9th place guy get? At least you know you'll walk away with something.
Are they saying who the 9 are? I would think people that were there would know & talk.
Of course, FKL, that might be why it's worth $9 million. If ESPN didn't cover it (and pay handsomely for that coverage), they might only be playing for, say, $7 million.
Nice chunk of change, sure, but still...
wow that SUCKS for those players! it would be like that South Park episode where Cartman wanted to cryogenicaly freeze himself rather than wait a few months for a Wii. I think I would go crazy waiting that long.
I remember playing a few all-day TCG tournaments and the fatigue factor was an important unique aspect of it. the (4 month!) delay will certainly affect whatever the outcome might have been.
the mole
Man, and people complain about the TV breaks in hockey and football.
This one is a BIATCH.
Can you imagine some of the logistical problems and all of the "what if" scenarios?
What if one of those players DIED during the break? Can you imagine the suing that the family would be doing? Or if (hold your laughter) the casino or sponsoring company holding the money went bankrupt or got ripped off in the meantime?
The list of bad things to this is endless...
I think the size of the prize is directly proportional to the number of people in the tourney, no? I mean it doesn't matter if ESPN is involved or not, the prize money is still the same. I could be wrong, but that's the way I understood it to work.
As Jared said, what does the 9th place guy get? I bet it is still life-changing amounts of money (or at least it would be for me) so I'd be happy to get 9th.
I got curious enough to look...
# 1st Place:......... $9,119,517
# 2nd Place:........ $5,790,024
# 3rd Place:........ $4,503,352
# 4th Place:........ $3,763,515
# 5th Place:........ $3,088,012
# 6th Place:........ $2,412,510
# 7th Place:........ $1,769,174
# 8th Place:........ $1,286,672
# 9th Place:........ $900,670
# 666th Place:....... $21,230
(Why they saw fit to tell us the devil's cut on the website I looked at I couldn't tell you)
Here is the link for where I got the info.
Maybe not, but why does ESPN have this power? Someone has to be getting paid. Maybe none of that money trickles down to the competitors, but it's gotta go somewhere.
Post a Comment