Wednesday, August 16, 2006

LAX-citement

Today, on a one-day business-related trip, I flew into and back out of LAX. And it was really interesting (I'd say annoying) to see how one of the nation's largest airports handles security now that we're all acting like we're the Wicked Witch of the West. (You know, the whole liquids thing...)

Actually, let me start with the liquid ban itself. When I flew last week to Indianapolis, I departed on the same morning as the crazy "attack scare." The hastily printed notices at the airport said just flat-out "no liquids." It went on with a long list of things "this includes," making no mentions of any exceptions. Now, a few days later, the notices have been updated. It's okay to bring baby formula, if you have a child with you. It's okay to bring some quantity of insulin or another "critical medication." And one or two other things that...

Well, I was going to say, "that make sense." Except that somewhat implies that I think everything else doesn't make sense to bring on a plane. And that's crap. Look, I know absolutely nothing about making liquid explosives, but it seems to me that if the original plotters were going to make it look like whatever it was going to look like (a can of Coke? a jar of hair gel?) that they could just as easily make it look like a supply of insulin or a bottle of formula. In other words, I don't see how these new security measures could stop someone with enough determination. (Bear in mind, the successfully-foiled plot of last week was so foiled not at an airport, but through outside investigation!) Instead, it's just one more inconvenience for the rest of us, like taking off our shoes to put on the x-ray belt, that serves very little purpose.

But I digress. Let's get to subject of LAX in particular. When it came time to board our plane for Denver, a dozen U.S. Army soldiers in full camo fatigues appeared at the gate, flanked the path to the ticket scanner, and proceed to start hand-inspecting the carry-ons of people boarding the flight.

My first thought was, "what the hell is this? Join the army, inspect luggage? We unpack more bags before 9AM than most people pack all day?" Of course, the thought that almost immediately followed was, "hell, if I were in the army, you bet I'd rather have that assignment than a tour of duty in Iraq!"

Once over the shock of seeing the soldiers there in the first place, I looked around the concourse and developed still more questions. These army people were dispatched only to our flight, out of several other gates within "eyeshot" (including two others also in the boarding process). What made our flight so special?

By this point, they're already "inviting first class and zone 1" to board the plane, and these grunts are opening up the carry-ons of every single passenger and thoroughly looking through their stuff. Never mind that it had all been inspected already on the x-ray machine. Never mind some grimy stranger messing up your stuff (all due respect to our men and women in the armed forces). And never mind the fact that takeoff is scheduled in about 15-20 minutes. There's no chance this flight is taking off anywhere close to on time.

Minutes later... "Zone 2" is called. And then "zone 3 and 4." And that's when it got even stranger. Now, they suddenly started letting people on without checking their bags at all! If one of the soldiers finished up, well then the next person in line traded the new car for the live llama hiding behind curtain #2, and had to submit to the search. Otherwise, on the plane with you! So halfway through, they abandoned the little pretense they had going of this not being a random, arbitrary, and ineffective search, and the sham was fully exposed.

How can people not realize this emperor has no clothes? When is enough going to be enough?

8 comments:

Anonymous said...

maybe they were just trying to "freak out" a potential smuggler? hoping they would see the soldiers and run away? we are soooo close to stasis-tubes on airplanes. just knock everyone out and revive them at the destination. I'm sure if they could do it safely and consistently, they would...

the mole

Anonymous said...

Quite honestly, all of this thourough searching and military presence at the airports with the passengers is just a pretty face on a problem that still exists. Last I understood anyway, most of the staff, vendors, etc. don't have to go through any of these same precautions, so all of these dangerous things can still be gotten onto a plane - just in a different way. It's just the political correctness here in the US of not wanting to offend anyone that makes it hard.

Why was this terrorism ring busted in Europe? Because they're busy hunting and searching for the actual bad guys and terrorists...not trying to stop them by having grandma take off her shoes for a cavity search and telling a couple that their baby's name is on a no-fly list so would ya step over here please?

Like so many things here in America of late, a problem has not been fixed or solved. Merely given a very pretty bandaid that makes it look to the voters like something's being done.

/end rant
//But that's just my opinion, I could be wrong. ;)

TheGirard said...

*steps on soapbox*

Are you sure they were US Army? Or did you assume they were US Army because they were dressed in fatigues? They could be National Guard.

I know it inconveniences us all and that we would all just like to to get where we are going. Sometimes there are precautions that need to be made. What if there was a metal detector at Columbine on that day? Do you think those innocent people would have died?

I'm sure that they were instructed to do spot checks. And that's why they stopped halfway through. Would you have preferred if they went through everyone's stuff again and held up the entire plane?

I'm not a militant/militia type of person, but some precautions are necessary.

DrHeimlich said...

The breast pocket of the fatigues said "U.S. Army."

As for Columbine, yes, absolutely, if there were a metal detector at the door, everyone still would have died. Klebold and Harris were not stashing guns in their lockers slowly over days or weeks. They just arrived at school one morning armed to the teeth, walked in the front door, and started shooting. A metal detector only would have made a shrieking noise as the two of them stepped over the body of the guard manning the detector.

My preference on the plane would be: if you're doing something half-assed anyway, don't do it. Especially when even had they done it "full-assed," it would not have been effective in stopping anyone with determination and creativity.

Anonymous said...

Illusion. Of. Security.

- Enrique

Jono said...

I got no problem with random searches, the 'puffer' machines that can detect explosives, etc... because those security systems seem to work. Of course, I would like to see some hard numbers on how many false-positive and true-negatives those devices get.

But the true enemies of the United States I think are smarter than this governement sometimes. If we really wanted to protect ourselves we would have a 20 foot high wall on the US-Mexico border for the ENTIRE length of the border.

You mention LAX... it was only by an observant border guard in December 1999 in Washington State that prevented a terrorist attack on LAX

GiromiDe said...

The TSA is no improvement over the screeners there before. Airports are still full of holes, staffed by some who just don't give a damn, whether they're working for the government or some private security firm.

Kathy said...

Precautions that catch no one and make no one any safer are *not* necessary.

They are lip service, and any illusion of security you get from them is just that. An ILLUSION.