Fans of horror and subscribers to Showtime may be familiar with the series Masters of Horror. The idea is simple: recruit as many of the most famous names in the horror industry to each do their own one-hour episodes of this anthology series. In practice, I have heard that the actual episodes have not on average lived up to their pedigree -- but without a Showtime subscription, I can't really say for sure.
Of particular interest, though, is one installment from the show's first season. It was directed by an acclaimed filmmaker from Japan, Takashi Miike. It was intended to have an Eastern influence, and represent a different approach to horror. For his episode, he directed an adaptation of a short story called Imprint.
When he was finished, he had made something that even Showtime -- a pay cable station -- refused to air, saying it was too controversial for them. Ultimately, it was over half a year before US audiences were able to see the episode, when it was finally released on DVD.
Friends of mine recently got the DVD for Christmas. Last weekend, when I was over at their place, I was convinced to see what all the hubbub was about.
In America, we've come to view the "horror" genre as one that inspires scares and/or tension. Imprint is horror in the strictest definition of the word. This film inflicts truly awful, horrific imagery upon you, challenging you continue to watch, or look away, or cope in some way.
It made my brain feel like it needed a hot shower.
Now, I've said before that my top criteria in giving a good review to a movie or television series is that it evoke some kind of emotional response in me. By that criteria, Imprint couldn't get higher marks.
But this is not the only criteria. The story isn't structured very well. A lot of the acting is terrible, as the decision was made to film in English instead of using Japanese with English subtitles -- even though a large portion of the cast spoke no English and thus could only learn their lines phonetically. And some flourishes in the plot at the end are honestly rather incoherent.
Then, of course, there's the question of if you even want to watch something that evokes this particular kind of emotional response in you. For a true masterpiece, I might be compelled to say yes. But for this? I say no. Stay away.
Stay far, far away.
5 comments:
What was the horror? do tell.
feel free to spoil this for us curious folks. I've come to realize lately that I may be somewhat obsessively spoiler-paranoid but I'm trying to work on it (i.e. not letting accidental spoilers bother me so much (damn 24 commercials!!!))
but if even describing what was going on is just as disturbing as watching, then I'm cool with not knowing....
the mole
Dr., now after seeing who the director of this is - I completely understand why it was so totally disturbing and just disgustingly f-ed up. If anyone would like another reference of what a demented sick bleep Takashi Miike is, look up a flick called Ichi the Killer.
http://akas.imdb.com/title/tt0296042/
Even the TRAILER had a man's face sliding down a wall and a woman having her nipples sliced off. Methiolate couldn't remove the damage to my eyes.
Like we've discussed before...dude, there's just something wrong with the Japanese.
Really. Feel better about your life NOT knowing about this guy's movies. :P
-Roland
Well, for those who want to know all the... heh-heh... gory details....
There is an extremely graphic torture scene about halfway through the one hour program, in which you actually see needles driven underneath a woman's fingernails and toenails, and then through the gums inside her mouth. She is then left to dangle by her feet with her hands bound and all the needles still stuck in her.
However, the fact of the matter is, the controversy sparked by this piece has absolutely nothing to do with this scene of torture. Let's face it America, we all but love our torture. Fairly edgy depictions of torture show up every other week on 24, and I can assure you that Showtime would have had no problems whatsoever running this scene on their air.
But Miike dove right through a taboo that America will not suffer -- abortion.
In the final third of the film, a "midwife" character is introduced, and she performs an abortion right there on screen. We see her take several fetuses in a bucket out to the river behind her house, and dump them out to wash away.
All of this is depicted in full detail on screen.
"Whoa..."
/keanu
Post a Comment